1. The evidence authorized the jury to find that the principal witness for the prosecution was not an accomplice of the defendant. Therefore, in order legally to convict the accused, corroboration of the testimony of this witness was not necessary.
2. Under the facts of the case there is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
3. The evidence'authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.