Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc. 834 F. Supp. 632

834 F. Supp. 632

Louis MIANO, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Michael R. WIDENER, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant. Morton WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. AC & R ADVERTISING, INC., Defendant.

Nos. 91 Civ. 1280 (LBS), 91 Civ. 1676 (LBS) and 91 Civ. 3906 (LBS).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Aug. 19, 1993.

’ENDORSEMENT

SAND, District Judge.

The Orders of Magistrate Judge Katz of Feb. 25, 1993, 148 F.R.D. 68, and of May 6, 1993 are adopted and approved.

*633The Court finds no error in Judge Katz’s thoughtful and thorough opinion and ruling.

So Ordered.

Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.
834 F. Supp. 632

Case Details

Name
Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.
Decision Date
Aug 19, 1993
Citations

834 F. Supp. 632

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!