15 A.D.2d 669

Robert A. Bentz, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem Charles Bentz, et al., Respondents, v. Estelle Krasner et al., Appellants.

While the order of July 27, 1961, denied a motion which was nominally characterized by defendants as one for reargument, actually such motion was a new motion, since it was based on additional facts which were set forth in additional affidavits. Hence, said order is reviewable by appeal therefrom, and said order supersedes the original order. Accordingly, the appeal from the original order, entered June 21, 1961, is dismissed, without costs. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Bentz v. Krasner
15 A.D.2d 669

Case Details

Name
Bentz v. Krasner
Decision Date
Jan 22, 1962
Citations

15 A.D.2d 669

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!