3 Conn. Supp. 21

JOHN ANTONACCI VS. FRISBIE PIE COMPANY

Superior Court Fairfield County

File #48275

Present: Hon. ERNEST A. INGLIS, Judge.

Finklestone & Finklestone, Attorneys for the Plaintiff.

Shapiro, Goldstein & Brody, Attorneys for the Defendant.

MEMORANDUM FILED OCTOBER 15, 1935.

INGLIS, J.

The second count of the case clearly sounds in contract. It alleges a breach of the implied warranty of fitness.

In order to recover thereon it must appear therefore that there was privity of contract between the plaintiff and the *22defendant.

Burkhardt vs. Armour & Co., 115 Conn. 249.

It appears that the contract of sale of the pie in question was between Jennie Mastrianni and Patsy Antonacci. It is not alleged that Mastrianni was the agent of the defendant nor that Patsy Antonacci was the agent of the plaintiff, nor does privity of contract between the plaintiff and. defendant appear in any other way.

The demurrer is therefore sustained on all grounds stated.

Antonacci v. Frisbie Pie Co.
3 Conn. Supp. 21

Case Details

Name
Antonacci v. Frisbie Pie Co.
Decision Date
Oct 15, 1935
Citations

3 Conn. Supp. 21

Jurisdiction
Connecticut

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!