said, that the words of the Act of Assembly, were too clear and positive to admit of a doubt, and this Court cannot say, that a practice, not sanctioned' by any judicial decision, and in opposition to the express words of the act, is a correct practice.
1 Cranch 299 •
1 D.C. 299
Wiggins v. Wiggins.
A deposition, taken more than sfaf months after replication, in a chancery suit, cannot be read at the hearing, unless taken by consent, or. by order of the Court, or out of the district.
Bill, answer, replication, and dedimus awarded in October, *3001804. The cause was set for hearing in October, 1805. A deposition was taken in July, 1805.
Mr. Taylor
objected, that the deposition being taken more than six months after the replication, could not be read as evidence on the hearing. See the Act of Assembly of Virginia, November 29, 1792, ยง 46, p. 67.
Mr. Swann, contra
contended, that the Act of Assembly means' 'six months after the cause is set for hearing.
Mr. G. Lee and Mr. Simms
stated the practice to be as stated by Mr. Swann.
Wiggins v. Wiggins
1 Cranch 299 •
1 D.C. 299
Case Details
1 Cranch 299
1 D.C. 299
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!