The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
378 U.S. 584 •
12 L. Ed. 2d 1039 •
84 S. Ct. 1929 •
SCDB 1963-182 •
1964 U.S. LEXIS 873
SMITH v. CROUSE, WARDEN.
No. 915, Misc.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Petitioner pro se.
William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
dissenting.
In my opinion the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353, should be given retroactive application is deserving of plenary consideration. Cf. my dissenting opinion in LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U. S. 998.
Smith v. Crouse
378 U.S. 584 •
12 L. Ed. 2d 1039 •
84 S. Ct. 1929 •
SCDB 1963-182 •
1964 U.S. LEXIS 873
Case Details
378 U.S. 584
12 L. Ed. 2d 1039
84 S. Ct. 1929
SCDB 1963-182
1964 U.S. LEXIS 873
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!