As no bill of exceptions was taken and allowed in the trial court, the only question on this writ of error is whether the count of the indictment under which the plaintiff in error was convicted is sufficient, and as to that we And that the objections urged by the demurrer were not well founded. Judgment affirmed.
216 F. 991
WATTS v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 29, 1914.)
No. 2709.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia ; William T. Newman, Judge.
Stiles Hopkins, of Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff in error. John W. Henley, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., for the United States.
Before PARDEE, Circuit Judge, and GRUBB and CAUL, District Judges.
Watts v. United States
216 F. 991
Case Details
216 F. 991
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!