The attorney’s fees issue argued to us in this case was not adequately preserved before the Board. We are in agreement with the Board’s factual determination.
Affirmed.
48 Or. App. 229 •
615 P.2d 1206
Argued and submitted June 12,
affirmed September 15, 1980
In the Matter of the Compensation of THOMPSON, Petitioner - Cross-Respondent, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent - Cross-Petitioner.
(No. 78-7871-E, CA 16118)
615 P2d 1206
David W. Hittle, Salem, waived argument for petitioner - cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Olson, Hittle, Gardner & Evans, Salem.
Paul De Muniz, Salem, argued the cause for respondent - cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & De Muniz, P.C., Salem.
Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Roberts and Campbell, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Thompson v. Boise Cascade Corp.
48 Or. App. 229 •
615 P.2d 1206
Case Details
48 Or. App. 229
615 P.2d 1206
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!