163 F. App'x 535

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Miguel SERRATO-CAMACHO, a/k/a Rafael Rodrizuez, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10574.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*536Submitted Jan. 9, 2006.*

Decided Jan. 17, 2006.

David L. Gappa, Esq., USF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Victor M. Chavez, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: HUG, O’SCANNLAIN and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Miguel Serrato-Camacho appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal entry, being a deported alien found in the United States, and making false claims to United States citizenship in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1325(a)(1) & 1326 and 18 U.S.C. § 911.

Serrato-Camacho contends that the district court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory when imposing his sentence. Because SerratoCamacho was sentenced under the then-mandatory Sentencing Guidelines, and we cannot reliably determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory, we remand to the sentencing court to answer that question, and to proceed pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 916 (9th Cir.2005) (extending Ameline’s limited remand procedure to cases involving non-constitutional error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)).

REMANDED.

United States v. Serrato-Camacho
163 F. App'x 535

Case Details

Name
United States v. Serrato-Camacho
Decision Date
Jan 17, 2006
Citations

163 F. App'x 535

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!