520 F. App'x 241

Edward BOWIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees. Edward Bowie, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Henderson Police Department; John Doe; Jane Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 12-2448, 13-1131.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 23, 2013.

Decided: May 28, 2013.

Edward Bowie, Appellant Pro Se. Kari Russwurm Johnson, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward Bowie appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bowie v. Henderson Police Dept., No. 5:12-cv-00514-FL, 2012 WL 5392116 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2012 & Jan. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bowie v. Henderson Police Department
520 F. App'x 241

Case Details

Name
Bowie v. Henderson Police Department
Decision Date
May 28, 2013
Citations

520 F. App'x 241

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!