580 F. App'x 907

PHIL-INSUL CORP., doing business as IntegraSpec, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REWARD WALL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and Nudura Corporation and Polyform A.G.P Inc., Defendants-Cross-Appellants, and Buildblock Building Systems, LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and Amvic Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 2014-1078, 2014-1098.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 10, 2014.

Paul Adams, The Adams Law Firm, of Albuquerque, NM, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief were Michael T. Cooke and Brett M. Pinkus, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, TX.

Rachel C. Hughey, Merchant & Gould P.C., of Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendants-cross-appellants Nudura Corporation, et al. With her on the brief were Christopher J. Sorenson, Aaron M. Johnson, and Katherine E. Muller.

Kori Anne Bagrowski, Brinks Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, IL, argued for defendant-appellee Amvic Corporation. With her on the brief was James Robert Sobier-aj.

Michael R. Annis, Husch Blackwell, LLP, of St. Louis, MO, for defendant-appellee Reward Wall Systems, Inc. Of counsel was Andrew Richard Gilfoil. On the brief for defendant-appellee Buildblock Building Systems, LLC, were David M. Sullivan and Harvey D. Ellis, Jr, Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., of Oklahoma City, OK. Of counsel was Tynia A. Watson.

PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Systems, Inc.
580 F. App'x 907

Case Details

Name
Phil-Insul Corp. v. Reward Wall Systems, Inc.
Decision Date
Oct 10, 2014
Citations

580 F. App'x 907

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!