DECISION
There being substantial evidence to support the judgment of the trial court, its *22decision is affirmed. The Court of Appeals is reversed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
OMAN, C. J., and McMANUS, STEPHENSON and MONTOYA, JJ., concur.
90 N.M. 21 •
559 P.2d 398
559 P.2d 398
ROYAL INTERNATIONAL OPTICAL COMPANY, d/b/a Texas Optical, a Texas Corporation, Petitioner, v. TEXAS STATE OPTICAL COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, and Dr. N. J. Rogers, Individually, and as a partner of Texas State Optical Company, a/k/a TSO, Respondents.
No. 10813.
Supreme Court of New Mexico.
June 8, 1976.
Royal International Optical Co. v. Texas State Optical Co.
90 N.M. 21 •
559 P.2d 398
Case Details
90 N.M. 21
559 P.2d 398
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!