65 Ohio St. (n.s.) 567

No. 7473.

Fenner v. City of Cincinnati.

(Decided October 15, 1901.)

Error to the Superior Court of Cincinnati.

Ellis C. Kinkead; S. K. Rogers and Challen B. Ellis, for plaintiff in error.

Charles J. Sunt; Charles W. Scott and Frank F. Dinsmore, for defendants in error.

On consideration whereof this court being of opinion that the act of April 26,1898, entitled “an act sup*568plementary to section 2293, of the Revised Statutes of Ohio” (93 O. L., 374), is unconstitutional, and that the superior court at general term erred in reversing the judgment of that court in special term. It is ordered and adjudged that on the ground above stated the judgment of said superior court at general term be, and the same is hereby reversed. And proceeding to render the judgment which said court at general term should have rendered it is ordered and adjudged that the said judgment of said court at special term be and the same is hereby in all things affirmed.

Burket, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.

Minshall, C. J., and Williams, J., dissent.

Fenner v. City of Cincinnati
65 Ohio St. (n.s.) 567

Case Details

Name
Fenner v. City of Cincinnati
Decision Date
Oct 15, 1901
Citations

65 Ohio St. (n.s.) 567

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!