1 Brayt. 24

No. 3.

FLAGG against WALKER.

Rutland,

1817.

A promise, made to a Sheriff, who had suffered an execution to run out in his hands in consideration that he would not take out an alias execution, is void for want of consideration ; the Sheriff having no authority to pray out execution unless directed or empowered by the creditor; no costs were allowed in this case the decision being made on motion in arrest, by defendant.

Flagg v. Walker
1 Brayt. 24

Case Details

Name
Flagg v. Walker
Decision Date
Jan 1, 1970
Citations

1 Brayt. 24

Jurisdiction
Vermont

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!