Stuart v. Bailey 57 Neb. 578

A. P. S. Stuart v. Thomas Bailey. A. P. S. Stuart v. Isaac Holt. A. P. S. Stuart v. Jones National Bank. A. P. S. Stuart v. Utica Bank.

Filed February 9, 1899.

Nos. 8612, 8613, 8614, 8615.

Removal of Causes: National Banks: False Statements: Liability oe Directors. Judgments affirmed pursuant to rulings in preceding case. (Stuart v. Bank of Siapleimrst, 57 Neb. 569.)

Proceedings in Error from the district court of Seward county. Tried below before Bates, J.

Affirmed.

The parties filed the following stipulation:

“It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties plaintiff and defendant in the above entitled causes, respectively, that briefs shall be filed in the first numbered case, No. 8611, A. P. S. Stuart against Bank of Staple-burst. It is further stipulated and agreed that inasmuch as the records in all these cases are alike, and the same identical points are raised by the petition in error in each case, that the order of the court made in No. 8611, A. P. S. Stuart against Staplehurst, shall be the order in each of the other cases and shall be entered therein; that if No. 8611 is reversed, all said causes shall stand reversed, and if said No. 8611 is affirmed, all of said causes shall stand affirmed, the same as if the briefs were filed and arguments made separately in each of said cases.”

O. G. Flanslmrg, for plaintiff in error. ’

George IT7. Loioley, Pound & Burr, and Biggs & Thomas¡ con tra.