596 F. App'x 251

Starsha SEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRAYER UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-2123.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 24, 2015.

Decided: March 11, 2015.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, Joleen Okun, Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion and her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No. 8:12-cv-02927-DKC, 2014 WL 1573638 (D.Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sewell v. Strayer University
596 F. App'x 251

Case Details

Name
Sewell v. Strayer University
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2015
Citations

596 F. App'x 251

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!