No opinion. Reversed and remanded.
124 F. 1018
ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. v. HORTON.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 11, 1903.)
No. 1,150.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee.
McFarland & Neblett and J. W. Canada, for plaintiff in error. H. N. Moon and Francis: Byrne, for defendant in error.
St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Horton
124 F. 1018
Case Details
124 F. 1018
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!