269 N.Y. 613

Seeck & Kade, Inc., Appellant, v. R. Tomshinsky, Individually and Trading as Webster Cut Rate Drug Stores, et al., Respondents.

(Argued December 2, 1935;

decided January 7, 1936.)

*614 Mark Eisner and James F. Donnelly for appellant.

Jay Leo Rothschild and .Froncés Kneitel for respondents.

Jay Leo Rothschild for Heam Department Stores, Inc., amicus curios.

Charles Goldman and Harold Dublirer for Cooper & Cooper, Inc,, amicus curice.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Doubleday, Doran & Co. v. Macy & Co. (269 N. Y. 272). No opinion.

Concur; Crañe, Ch, J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.

Seeck & Kade, Inc. v. Tomshinsky
269 N.Y. 613

Case Details

Name
Seeck & Kade, Inc. v. Tomshinsky
Decision Date
Jan 7, 1936
Citations

269 N.Y. 613

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!