United States v. Cox 638 F. App'x 401

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Johnny Cox, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v, California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Cox has not filed a response. Although Cox remains subject to a term of supervised release, he has completed the term of imprisonment imposed upon the revocation of his probation. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivólous issue for appellate • review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw, is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot, see United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).