The facts in this case are quite similar to those in Windels v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 98 N. Y. Supp. 854, decided at the last term of this court. The opinion in that case is decisive of the question raised upon this appeal. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
99 N.Y.S. 1134
ATWOOD, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
March, 1906.)
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District. Action by Charles G. Atwood against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.
Reversed.
Horace A. Davis, for appellant.
Charles A. Gardiner (George R. Coughlin, of counsel), for respondent.
Atwood v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
99 N.Y.S. 1134
Case Details
99 N.Y.S. 1134
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!