Motion granted, and question certified as follows: Were the clauses in the complaint stricken out by the order properly stricken out as redundant or irrelevant?
91 N.Y.S. 1099
KAVANAUGH v. SATTERLEE et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Third Department.
January 13, 1905.)
Action by Charles H. Kavanaugh against Herbert L. Satterlee, impleaded with others.
Kavanaugh v. Satterlee
91 N.Y.S. 1099
Case Details
91 N.Y.S. 1099
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!