In our view this case is but 'a necessary step in an effort to have the Supreme Court review and reverse its decision in Group No. 1 Oil Corporation v. Bass, 283 U. S. 279, 51 S. Ct. 432, 75 L. Ed. 1032. The facts in the present case are the same as in that one. Such being the situation, we affirm the judgment entered by the court below (2 F. Supp. 41), which rightly followed Group No. 1 Oil Corporation v. Bass, 283 U. S. 279, 51 S. Ct. 432, 75 L. Ed. 1032.
67 F.2d 985
BIG LAKE OIL CO., Appellant, v. D. B. HEINER, Collector, Appellee.
No. 5117.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Dec. 23, 1933.
John S. McKelvy, Jr., of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Baker, Botts, Andrews & Wharton and Homer L. Bruce, all of Houston, Tex., for appellant.
E. Barrett Prettyman, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and Horatio S. Dumbauld, U. S. Atty., of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Henry C. Glark, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., and John A. McCann, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Big Lake Oil Co. v. Heiner
67 F.2d 985
Case Details
67 F.2d 985
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!