201 F.2d 512

C. Howard HOOK and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller, v. HOOK & ACKERMAN, Inc., Appellant.

No. 1082.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 22, 1953.

Decided Feb. 6, 1953.

Harry Price, New York City (Stoneciptier & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney BirĂ³n, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.

Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opihion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F.Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
201 F.2d 512

Case Details

Name
Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
Decision Date
Feb 6, 1953
Citations

201 F.2d 512

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!