265 A.D. 834

Benjamin Scagnelli, Appellant, v. Angelo A. Mastrangelo, Doing Business as United Carting Co., et al., Respondents.

Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Close, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment with the following memorandum: The disputed questions of fact were submitted to the jury on a fair and impartial charge and in our opinion the finding of the jury may not be said to be against the weight of the evidence. (Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Railway Co., 136 App. Div. 373.)

Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo
265 A.D. 834

Case Details

Name
Scagnelli v. Mastrangelo
Decision Date
Oct 19, 1942
Citations

265 A.D. 834

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!