205 A.D. 894

Ferdinand Poltl, Respondent, v. Joseph Caracciolo and Andrew M. O’Connor, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, Defendants.

Judgment reversed on the law and in the exercise of our discretion, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. We are of opinion that the amendment to the answer, sought by the defense, should have been allowed. (See Rules Civ. Prac., rule 166.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Poltl v. Caracciolo
205 A.D. 894

Case Details

Name
Poltl v. Caracciolo
Decision Date
Feb 1, 1923
Citations

205 A.D. 894

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!