MEMORANDUM **
Agustinus David Moniaga, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations in removal proceedings, including claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir.2005). We grant the petition for review and remand.
The BIA abused its discretion by basing its prejudice inquiry on a heightened standard where it concluded that Moniaga failed to establish a prima facie case of eligibility for the relief sought. See Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 899-90 (9th Cir.2003) (alien must demonstrate that counsel’s performance “was so inadequate that it may have affected the outcome of the proceedings”); Maravilla Maravilla v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 855, 858 (9th Cir.2004) (alien “need not show that they would win *615or lose on any claims”) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). We therefore remand for the BIA to reconsider its prejudice determination.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.