135 A.D.3d 976 22 N.Y.S.3d 913

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Quanmik Wells, Appellant.

[22 NYS3d 913]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hollie, J.), imposed June 4, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

When the Supreme Court explained the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal to him, it improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea. Accordingly, the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137 [2014]; People v Bond, 109 AD3d 481 [2013]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

People v. Wells
135 A.D.3d 976 22 N.Y.S.3d 913

Case Details

Name
People v. Wells
Decision Date
Jan 27, 2016
Citations

135 A.D.3d 976

22 N.Y.S.3d 913

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!