226 A.D. 768

Welworth Automotive Corporation, Respondent, v. Etco Trading Corporation, Appellant, and James Sonnenblick, Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Welworth Automotive Corp. v. Etco Trading Corp.
226 A.D. 768

Case Details

Name
Welworth Automotive Corp. v. Etco Trading Corp.
Decision Date
Apr 1, 1929
Citations

226 A.D. 768

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!