The overruling of the defendant’s objection to testimony of police officers as to how they laid a “trap” for the defendant (not an entrapment) discloses no error for any reason assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
Bell, P. J., and Whitman, J., concur.
*139 Henritze, Baker & Bailey, Walter M. Henritze, Jr., for appellant.
Lewis B. Slaton, Solicitor General, J. Walter LeCraw, J. Roger Thompson, for appellee.