Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is “not in fact optical glass but is an article made of a type of glass not provided for in the act,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
44 Cust. Ct. 307
No. 63683.
Fish Schurman Corporation v. United States,
protest 59/10019 (San Francisco).
Fish Schurman Corp. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 307
Case Details
44 Cust. Ct. 307
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!