delivered the opinion ojt the court.
Ry section 795, Kentucky Statutes, any company, person or corporation ojierating railroad cars or coaches by steam or otherwise on any railroad line or track within the State are required to furnish separate coaches or cars for the travel or transportation of the white and colored passengers on their respective lines of railroad. Each compartment of a coach divided by a good and substantial wooden partition, with a door therein, is deemed a separate coach within the meaning of the statute, but each separate coach or compartment must bear in some conspicuous place appropriate words in plain letters indicating the race for which it is set apart.
Section 796 declares that the person or company operating the road shall make no difference or discrimination in the quality or convenience or accommodations in the cars or •coaches or partitions set apart for the white and colored passengers.
Section 797 provides that any company that shall fail or refuse to comply with the provisions of sections 795 and '796 shall be deemed guilty- of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof be lined not less than $500 nor more than IjflljOOO for each offense.
The indictment charges that the railroad company did “unlawfully and wilfully, bjr its agents, employes or those in •charge of its train of cars, fail or refuse to furnish a separate •coach for white and colored passengers of the same quality, convenience and accommodations in its cars or coaches or partition set apart for white and colored passengers.”
*665On tlie trial tlie company was found guilty and fined $500. The train in question was a special, not running on the time of any regular train on the road. It was chartered by South & Hargis to run from Greensburg to Oampbellsville. They sold the tickets and collected the fares and directed where the train was to stop, but the train was operated with the company’s crew, including the conductor.
At a station some five miles from Oampbellsville the train was stopped to receive passengers. Among those who boarded the train were two negroes, Thomas White and his wife, Lula. Smith collected their fare to Oampbellsville. White and his wife got in the car which was used by the company for colored passengers on the road, and upon which he had been in the habit of riding. Smith ordered White and his wife to take a car which was attached to the train which appears to have been a mail and tool car, and which does not appear to have had the same conveniences and accommodations of the other cars. At the time in question the compartment in the coach set apart for colored passengers was partly used by white passengers.
It is not contended that the compartment in the coach used for colored passengers was not of the same quality and did not have the same conveniences and accommodations as those used for carrying white passengers. The offense, if one was committed, consisted in those in charge of the train removing the colored passengers from the compartment in the coach provided by the company for them to the so-called “tool car.”
White proves that he was in the compartment for colored passengers when ordered into the tool car. Under the statute a penalty is denounced against persons, companies .and corporations operating lines off railroads for the failure *666to furnish separate cars or coaches or compartments therein •without discrimination in quality, conveniences and accommodations for the travel or transportation -of white an<! colored passeng-ers.
Where' the company has furnished the kind of ears or coaches which the law requires, section 799, Kentucky Statutes, imposes the duty on the conductor or manager of the railroad to assign the white and colored passengers to their respective coaches or compartments therein.
Section 800 provides a penalty to be imposed on the conductor or manager for his failure to discharge the duty required of him. This is not a proceeding to recover damages of the company for a wrongful act of its agent or employe. It is a penal prosecution to impose a fine against the company for the alleged violation of a statute. The company can not be fined for an act of those whom it puts in charge of a train because they may have violated a penal statute. The failure to furnish the coaches for the transportation of white and colored passengers of the kind required by the statute is an offense of the company. A failure to assign the white and colored passengers to their respective coaches or compartments is an offense of such conductor or those in charge of the train.
For the offense of the company the conductor can not be convicted and fined. Neither can the company be convicted and fined for the offense of the conductor or those in charge of the trains, as is the result of this prosecution. The court should have told the jury to find for the defendant.
The case is reversed for proceedings in conformity with this opinion.