— Upon the authority of In re Wakefield v. Rhay, ante p. 168, 356 P. (2d) 596 and In re Aichele v. Rhay, ante p. 178, 356 P. (2d) 326, the writ of habeas corpus herein is granted; the judgment of conviction is vacated; and the petitioner is remanded to King County for a rearraignment and further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinions in the Wakefield, supra, and Aichele, supra, cases.
57 Wash. 2d 908
[No. 35295.
Department Two.
January 12, 1961.]
In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Biddy Mack Wigham, Petitioner, v. B. J. Rhay, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.1
Warner, Pierce & Peden (B. Gray Warner, of counsel), for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Rembert Ryals, Assistant, for respondent.
Wigham v. Rhay
57 Wash. 2d 908
Case Details
57 Wash. 2d 908
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!