A majority of the court is of opinion that there is no error in the record. The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.
186 F. 489
NASH et al. v. UNITED STATES. †
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 29, 1910.)
No. 1,951.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Dis* trict of Georgia.
Criminal prosecution by the United States against the American Naval Stores Company, Edmund S. Nash, and others. From a judgment of conviction, defendants bring error.
Affirmed.
See, also, 172 Fed. 455; 186 Fed. 592.
Samuel B. Adams and Peter W. Meldrim, for plaintiffs in error.
Alexander Akerman, Asst. U. S. Atty., and W. M. Toomer, Special Asst. U. S. Atty.
Before PAIiDEE and SIIEUBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
Nash v. United States
186 F. 489
Case Details
186 F. 489
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!