292 S.W.3d 605

Donald O. CRUMP, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 92317.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Sept. 22, 2009.

Lisa M. Stroup, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, James B. Farnsworth, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald O. Cramp appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We *606have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Crump v. State
292 S.W.3d 605

Case Details

Name
Crump v. State
Decision Date
Sep 22, 2009
Citations

292 S.W.3d 605

Jurisdiction
Missouri

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!