In an opinion in this cause, May 15,1978,1 we asked the Court of Appeals of Maryland to answer for us this question: whether under the law of that State 2 the settlor of an irrevocable trust, reserving to himself only the right to receive, during his lifetime, the income from the investments and other personalty of the trust, has such an estate in the corpus thereof as constitutes “property and rights to property” subject to the lien of the United States for taxes owing by the settlor on such income.3 The Court at once accepted our certification of the issue and has now decided it with an exigesis of thoroughness and clarity. Its holding was that, under Maryland law, the assets of the trust, in the present context, were not “property or rights to property” of Baldwin, the trustor.
This counsel leads to affirmance of the District Court’s determination in this case that the Government could not succeed in its effort to subject the trust assets to the income taxes owing by William W. Baldwin.
At once we acknowledge a sincere gratitude to the Maryland Court of Appeals. Its research of the law and accompanying refinement of its complexities were an invaluable contribution to our work. But, more, it gave the decision a finality we could not give it.
Affirmed.