123 N.Y.S. 1119

HARE, Respondent, v. FREDERICK FIGGE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 26, 1910.)

Action by Georgiana Hare against the Frederick Figge Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the record does not disclose evidence sufficient to show negligence on the part of the defendant.

Hare v. Frederick Figge Co.
123 N.Y.S. 1119

Case Details

Name
Hare v. Frederick Figge Co.
Decision Date
May 26, 1910
Citations

123 N.Y.S. 1119

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!