369 F. App'x 809

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roosevelt Roy NEWTON, aka Seal B, aka Birdman, aka Bird, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-50421.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 2010.*

Filed March 4, 2010.

Kevin M. Lally, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los An-geles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William Charles Melcher, Esquire, Mel-cher, Melcher & Melcher, Calabasas, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Roosevelt Roy Newton appeals from the denial of his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduced sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Newton’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Newton
369 F. App'x 809

Case Details

Name
United States v. Newton
Decision Date
Mar 4, 2010
Citations

369 F. App'x 809

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!