The Court
held (Freedman, J., writing, Truax, J., concurring) that the judgment and order should be affirmed with costs.
26 Jones & S. 584 • 58 N.Y. Super. Ct. 584
Albert Nolte, Respondent v. The Manhattan Railway Company, Appellant.
Decided June 27, 1890.
Appeal from judgment entered in favor of plaintiff upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
Davies & Rapallo, for appéllant. Charles Steckler, for respondent.
Before Freedman and Truax, JJ.
Nolte v. Manhattan Railway Co.
26 Jones & S. 584 • 58 N.Y. Super. Ct. 584
Case Details
26 Jones & S. 584
58 N.Y. Super. Ct. 584
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!