75 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1495

Maas, Respondent, v. Cunard S. S. Co., Limited, Appellant.

(City Court of New York, General Term.

October 30, 1896.)

Action by Henry Maas against the Cunard Steamship Company, Limited. Xord, Day & Lord, for appellant. Mashbir & Cukor, for respondent.

Fitzsimons, J.

—The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defend-ant for the value of certain baggage lost by the defendant. The plaintiff resides in Brooklyn, and the cause of action arose there. The defendant is a foreign corporation, and was served with the summons and-complaint in this city. Upon this appeal, the defendant contends that the court has no jurisdiction herein. In making this claim, we think the defendant is in error.- The cause of action arose within this state. Plaintiff is a resident •of this state, and defendant was served with process in this city. Under such circumstances (see section 1780 of the Code of Civil Procedure), this court has jurisdiction herein. The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. Van Wyck, C. J., concurs.

Maas v. Cunard Steamship Co.
75 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1495

Case Details

Name
Maas v. Cunard Steamship Co.
Decision Date
Oct 30, 1896
Citations

75 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1495

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!