346 F. App'x 291

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro Lopez GODINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-10614.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 14, 2009.*

Filed Oct. 2, 2009.

*292Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Alejandro Lopez Godinez, California City, CA, pro se.

Before: SILVERMAN, RAWLINSON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Alejandro Lopez Godinez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 78-month sentence imposed for possession of a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking crimes, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)®.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Godinez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Godinez
346 F. App'x 291

Case Details

Name
United States v. Godinez
Decision Date
Oct 2, 2009
Citations

346 F. App'x 291

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!