wrote for denial of motion for new
trial, and that plaintiff’s exceptions be overruled, and defendants permitted to enter judgment upon the verdict with costs.
Speir, J., concurred.
10 Jones & S. 573 •
42 N.Y. Super. Ct. 573
SUSAN L. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. SIDNEY DILLON, et al., Defendants.
Before Curtis, Ch. J., and Speir, J.
Decided May 8, 1877.
A. H. Wagner, for plaintiff.
Alex. Thain, for defendants.
*574On the trial of this action, a verdict was directed for the defendants, and the plaintiff’s exceptions ordered to be heard ad the general term in the first instance.
The appeal involved only the consideration of testimony.
Harris v. Dillon
10 Jones & S. 573 •
42 N.Y. Super. Ct. 573
Case Details
10 Jones & S. 573
42 N.Y. Super. Ct. 573
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!