2 Ohio App. Unrep. 2

State v. Young

[Cite as 2 AOA 2]

Case No. C-890136

Hamilton County, (1st)

Decided March 21, 1990

4th Amendment U.S. Constitution

OQO9 10

Arthur M. Ney, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, and David L. Prem, Esq., 420 Hamilton County Courthouse, Court & Main Streets, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, for Plaintiff-Appellant,

Timothy A. Smith, Esq., 13 East Court Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, for Defendant-Appellee.

Per Curiam.

This cause came on to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App. R. 11.1 and Local Rule 12, the record from the trial court, the briefs and the arguments of counsel.

Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio, appeals from the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in which it granted the motion to suppress of the defendant-appellee, Terry Young. In its sole assignment of error the State maintains that the trial court erred when it granted the appellee's motion to suppress. We agree.

During the hearing on the appellee's motion to suppress, the arresting officer testified to specific, articulable facts which we find would cause a prudent police officer, in light of his professional experience, to reasonably conclude that the appellee was a party to a drug transaction. Therefore, the officer was entitled to make a reasonable inquiry into the appellee's activities. See Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868.

During that inquiry, the officer observed, in plain view, the handle of a spring-loaded baton1 protruding from a compartmentwithin the dashboard of the motor vehicle in which the appellee was seated.2 Appellee was arrested for carrying a concealed weapon, a violation of R.C. 2923.12. During the search of the appellee incident to his arrest, contraband was discovered which was ultimately suppressed by the trial court, and which is now the subject of this appeal.

The arrest for carrying a concealed weapon was lawful. We find persuasive the logic of the Courts of Appeals for Cuyahoga and Summit Counties which have held that where a portion of a partially concealed weapon is in plain view, the weapon may nevertheless be 'concealed' within the meaning of R.C. 2923.12. State v. Almalik (1987), 41 Ohio App. 3d 101, 105, 534 N.E.2d 898, 902; State v. Coker (1984), 15 Ohio App. 3d 97, 472 N.E.2d 747, 749.

Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred when it granted the appellee's motion to suppress the contraband that was discovered during the search of his person incident to his arrest for carrying a concealed weapon.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with law and this Decision.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

SHANNON, P.J., KLUSMEIER and HILDEBRANDT, JJ.

State v. Young
2 Ohio App. Unrep. 2

Case Details

Name
State v. Young
Decision Date
Mar 21, 1990
Citations

2 Ohio App. Unrep. 2

Jurisdiction
Ohio

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!