119 R.I. 918

M. P. No. 77-315.

State v. Guy Lanoue.

Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Nancy Marks Rahmes, Special Assistant

Because he failed to follow the avenue of direct appeal, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from this court. However, before we can address the issue of the writ, certain questions of fact must be established. Because this court cannot take testimony in a proceeding of this nature, the case is remanded to the Superior Court for an evidentiary hearing. See Lonardo v. Langlois, 98 R.I. 493, 205 A.2d 19 (1964).

After a hearing and fact findings, the Superior Court shall return the record to this court.

State v. Lanoue
119 R.I. 918

Case Details

Name
State v. Lanoue
Decision Date
Sep 30, 1977
Citations

119 R.I. 918

Jurisdiction
Rhode Island

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!