154 F. App'x 680

James BROOMFIELD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Charles A. DANIELS, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-35188.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.*

Decided Dec. 12, 2005.

James Broomfield, Sheridan, OR, pro se.

Craig J. Casey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for RespondentAppellee.

Before: GOODWIN, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner James Broomfield appeals pro se the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), we affirm. For the reasons stated by the district court, petitioner has not shown that due process was violated in depriving him of good time credits.

AFFIRMED.

Broomfield v. Daniels
154 F. App'x 680

Case Details

Name
Broomfield v. Daniels
Decision Date
Dec 12, 2005
Citations

154 F. App'x 680

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!