This is a suit involving the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien for labor and material furnished in the construction of a building. The appeal presents only questions of fact. It is not deemed necessary to recite the evidence which we think clearly supports the findings and decree of the lower court. . Affirmed.
130 Or. 210 •
279 Pac. 1119
Argued March 28,
affirmed July 30, 1929.
GEO. W. PAGE et Ux. v. C. E. STOCKTON.
(279 Pac. 1119.)
For appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. D. D. Rail.
For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Lewis, Lewis & Firme gem, with an oral argument by Mr. Arthur R. Letvis.
Page v. Stockton
130 Or. 210 •
279 Pac. 1119
Case Details
130 Or. 210
279 Pac. 1119
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!