29 Cust. Ct. 363

No. 56834.

Nivada Watch Corp. and Ira Furman Co. et al. v. United States,

protests 178410-K, etc. (New York).

*364Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respect to those which were the subject of United States v. Helbros Watch Co. et al. (38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as watch movements more than %o of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, supra.

Nivada Watch Corp. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 363

Case Details

Name
Nivada Watch Corp. v. United States
Decision Date
Aug 20, 1952
Citations

29 Cust. Ct. 363

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!