10 Ga. App. 835

3717.

Mack v. The State.

Decided April 2, 1912.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Madison — Judge Anderson.

August 26, 1911.

Williford & Lambert, for plaintiff in error.

A. G. Foster, solicitor, contra.

Russell, J.

1. A judgment' overruling a demurrer to an accusation

should be excepted to directly by exceptions pendente lite, properly preserved in the record, or by exceptions in the final bill of exceptions, . timely filed. It does not constitute a proper ground in a motion for a new trial. Williams v. State, 4 Ga. App. 853 (62 S. E. 525).

2. Grounds contained in an amendment to a motion for a new trial, not . vex-ified or .approved by the trial judge, can not be considered by this court. Soell v. State, 4 Ga. App. 337 (61 S. E. 514) ; Wilson v. Cobb, 4 Ga. App. 272 (61 S. E. 133).

3. The evidence in support of the verdict is very weak and unsatisfactory, but this court can not say that the verdict is wholly unauthorized.

Judgment affirmed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Mack v. State
10 Ga. App. 835

Case Details

Name
Mack v. State
Decision Date
Apr 2, 1912
Citations

10 Ga. App. 835

Jurisdiction
Georgia

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!