38 Cust. Ct. 614

(Reap. Dec. 8769)

The Spiegel Bros. Corp. v. United States

Entry No. 704906-1/13.

(Decided March 21, 1957)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The record indicates that at the call of the calendar there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff when the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement was called for hearing, and the case was ordered submitted by the court.

Rule 5 (a) of the rules of the court provides that—

The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a ease does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Spiegel Bros. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 614

Case Details

Name
Spiegel Bros. v. United States
Decision Date
Mar 21, 1957
Citations

38 Cust. Ct. 614

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!