This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
226 So. 2d 281
Jerry Daniel SPIGLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 69-220.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
Sept. 9, 1969.
Jerry Daniel Spigle, in pro. per.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
*282Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
Spigle v. State
226 So. 2d 281
Case Details
226 So. 2d 281
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!