52 N.Y. St. Rep. 123

Paul Zunz, Resp't, v. James H. Heroy et al., App'lts.

(New York Common Pleas, General Term,

Filed April 3, 1893.)

Appeal—Interlocutory judgment.

An appeal from a final judgment brings up for review an interlocutory *124judgment only where it has not already been reviewed upon a separate appeal. Where such interlocutory judgment has been affirmed at general term upon a separate appeal, it is conclusive.

Appeal from a filial judgment for plaintiff on the referee’s report.

Action for an accounting for the sales of merchandise consigned by plaintiff to defendants.

Otto Horwitz, for resp’t; W. W. Niles and Henry Thompson, for app’lts.

Per Curiam.

appeal from a final judgment brings up for An review an interlocutory judgment which has not already been reviewed upon a separate appeal therefrom. Code Civ. Pro., § 1316. The interlocutory judgment in this action was affirmed at general term upon appeal by the present appellant, Zunz v. Heroy, 15 Daly, 411; 28 St. Rep., 182, and is, therefore, conclusive upon us.

The closest scrutiny of the evidence and proceedings before the referee on the accounting directed by the interlocutory judgment, which involved the examination of much testimony and numerous exhibits, labor which the many inaccuracies in the brief of appellants’ counsel did not tend to diminish, has not enabled us to discover any error. The referee’s findings of fact are abundantly supported by the evidence, and his conclusions of law are fully warranted by the facts found.

The judgment and orders should be affirmed, with costs.

Bookstaver and Pryor, JJ., concur.

Zunz v. Heroy
52 N.Y. St. Rep. 123

Case Details

Name
Zunz v. Heroy
Decision Date
Apr 3, 1893
Citations

52 N.Y. St. Rep. 123

Jurisdiction
New York

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!